Reinventing the Wheel – Ideas That WWE Have Never Explored

Jamie Lithgow

About a year ago I posted some ideas that I thought would improve WWE. Looking back, all my ideas were pretty tried and trusted; nothing too ground breaking to be honest. This time it’s different, I’ve gone big and thought outside the box. The following are not just little tweaks; some of my ideas would require WWE to completely restructure their product. Obviously I am suggesting these ideas hypothetically. Say what you want about WWE, it is an extremely profitable organisation. I mean if I owned WWE I wouldn’t implement many, or even any, of these ideas because as the old saying goes – if it’s not broken, don’t fix it. However, I don’t own WWE and can quite happily entertain the thought of these drastic changes…

League Table/Ranking Structure

TNA do it, and do it well with the Bound For Glory series. Could WWE ever introduce a league or ranking structure? (Image courtesy of

TNA do it, and do it well with the Bound For Glory series. Could WWE ever introduce a league or ranking structure?
(Image courtesy of

WWE is sports entertainment. They pander to the entertainment industry, but what about sport? Professional wrestling (or whatever Vince prefers to call it) is presented as a competitive endeavour. So, can anyone name me a competitive professional sport that does not have a ranking system or league structure? You could argue UFC, but even they have clear number one contenders and separate weight classes. I can’t see how a ranking system could possibly be a bad thing for WWE because tangible evidence of who is the best and who is the worst at any given time is all around us. From the NFL and Premier League football to music charts and best sellers lists, we are surrounded by a context for almost anything we are interested in, so why not WWE? They’ve dipped their toe in the water with the King of Ring Tournament and the Power 25 Rankings on while the best part of TNA (in my opinion) is the Bound for Glory series. I can’t envision WWE implementing a fixture list due to the inconsistency of when talent is used, but a ranking system like in tennis or golf might work. This wouldn’t expose WWE in any way either; John Cena would still top the table, and if anything it would allow WWE more options. They could book Cena to lose cleanly on television, yet still have him top of the rankings. I mean it’s not like Novak Djokovic wins every tennis match he plays, but he’s still rightly considered the best in the world due his position at the top of the rankings. A ranking system would add a legitimacy to WWE and create interesting little sub plots in matches we might otherwise not care about, just like in other sports.


This is linked to the above idea, and the fact that Americans love a ‘post-season’. Playoffs are when the NFL, MLB and NBA come to life, so why don’t WWE have a version? With playoffs comes some kind of grand finale, a Superbowl if you will. Well, WWE have one of those, it’s called Wrestlemania. My idea would be to have a ‘regular season’ lasting from the Raw after ‘Mania to around Royal Rumble time. WWE already liken the road to Wrestlemania to playoffs, so why not actually have some? Finally we head to ‘Mania and a match between the two best guys from the last year. But what are they fighting for? Well, that leads me to my next idea…

A True World Champion

Could the World Heavyweight Championship ever be like the Vince Lombardi Trophy? (Image courtesy of

Could the World Heavyweight Championship ever be like the Vince Lombardi Trophy?
(Image courtesy of

For my rankings and playoffs idea to work the title picture would need to change drastically. I would unify the US and IC Titles, purely for simplicity and less clutter in the mid-card. The Divas and Tag Titles would stay as is, in their respective divisions. However I would do away with the World Heavyweight Championship in its current form. My version of the World Title would be the prize for the winner of the final playoff match at Wrestlemania. The man who performs the best over the course of a WWE year could call himself World Champion for the next full year, just like in the NFL or any other seasonal sport. The WWE Title would remain as is, the top prize defended on monthly PPVs. The WWE Champion would sit out-with the rankings, with the number one contender typically determined by who is atop the rankings. Upon losing the title the former champion would drop back into the ranking system. The Champion coming out of The Royal Rumble would go on to defend the WWE Title at Wrestlemania against the Royal Rumble winner. With this match set the playoffs to determine the participants in the World Heavyweight Championship match could begin. This would create two guys with a genuine claim to being the best. We could even see a World Champion vs. WWE Champion match down the line, and even see one man hold both titles.

Olympus Falls

By this I mean John Cena should lose, convincingly and cleanly to a new heel character, Bray Wyatt or Curtis Axel would be nice. WWE has never done this with its top babyface before, even though that’s what happens in so many movies. Hogan, Austin, Hart, none of them received a hyding while they were the top guy. The closest thing we’ve had was Brock Lesnar’s defeat of The Rock at Summerslam 2002, and that didn’t do either man much harm did it? Story telling logic says that the bad guy dominates the good guy, but the good guy regroups and seeks revenge after we’ve seen a montage of him training really hard. Bane kicked Batman’s ass, Clubber Lang put the smackdown on Rocky and the dinosaurs ate a bunch of people in Jurassic Park. However, in WWE the bad guy is usually presented as an empty threat. Brock Lesnar should have beaten Cena last year, allowing him to seek revenge down the line. Instead the good guy won, the monster was defeated and we moved on to the next story. If Olympus were to fall and Cena were to lose then the bad guy would benefit from the win while Cena would attract more sympathy as an underdog, with his eventual victory eclipsing memories of defeat.


The double ring, double cage WarGames match in WWE? My fingers are crossed... (Image courtesy of

The double ring, double cage WarGames match in WWE? My fingers are crossed…
(Image courtesy of

This idea isn’t exactly ground breaking, but it’s fairly clear that WWE could use some new matches. Introducing new matches is something that the competition has always done better. WCW, for better or worse, always tried new match types and stipulations. TNA are also very good in this respect. What was the last new concept introduced by WWE, Money in the Bank? Before that it was Elimination Chamber and before that it was probably Hell in a Cell. WWE have used versions of the ladder, table, cage and battle royal match for years, it’s about time they spiced it up. WarGames may not be Vince’s idea, but he currently employs the man who did dream it up. The release of ‘The Best of WarGames’ DVD later this year is also a positive indication that McMahon might be softening his stance on introducing ‘The Match Beyond’. When people think WarGames they tend to think double cage and two teams, but for a double cage there does have to be two rings. I’d like to see WWE tackle some match concepts that use two or more rings. World War 3 wasn’t a fantastic concept, but it wasn’t awful either. Surely WWE could add to this WCW idea and create something truly memorable?

4 thoughts on “Reinventing the Wheel – Ideas That WWE Have Never Explored

  1. All this is well and good, but what the WWE really needs is a return to its roots, lose the PG rating, bloody some heads, release the hounds as they say. They could do it with a NWO style take over and the bad guys are back. Smash some heads with some chairs, lose this were here for the kids shit and make a product some adults will actualy enjoy. I can’t make it through an episode of raw, and even the last wrestlemania had me seeing what else was on TV. But the thing this sport really needs is another Vince Russo, someone to push Vince and the creative team beyond their little bubble.


  2. I can’t disagree with most of that, and such things did cross my mind, but it’s hardly something WWE have never tried before. I would prefer more mature content on Raw, but I can (just about) handle it as it is. My main issue is on PPV. I may be way off here (literally, I don’t stay in the states) but I thought that there were no age ratings on PPV? If WWE want to have blood and guts on a PPV then there is no network to slap their wrists, surely? It would be good, especially in the 3 hour Raw era, to distinguish PPVs as serious business where serious shit goes down. However, WWE are not just in the business of making TV shows these days, it has so many deals and sponsors that it can’t just “lose the PG rating” and expect everything to be alright.



  3. I hear ya, it has obligations to people far outside of Vince Bubble, and he has contracts to fulfill, but I can’t stand what I am seeing, I want another WrestleMania 5 again! But that can never happen….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.